OPINIONS
Editorials
Commentaries
Columnists

The worth of a life

Official's spine-chilling suggestion dredges up some hard questions

By Barbara J. McKee
Tribune Columnist

October 4, 2005

There's a firestorm in England over the cost of severely disabled children and the leader of the Conservative Labor Party's solution.

As reported in The Mirror, a London newspaper, deputy mayor Owen Lister made his suggestion to fellow councilors as they discussed the costs of caring for the youngsters.

Lister, 79, said: "I would guillotine them. These are children you can't educate. It's merely a matter of caring for them until they die. The only difference between a terminally ill patient and a severely handicapped child is time."

The councilor argued the funds should instead be used to cut National Health Services waiting lists.

Lister promptly quit after his jaw-dropping remarks, yet stood behind them.

"It shows how peculiar we are as a society on this matter that we spend this vast amount of money caring for disabled youngsters to very little purpose at all," he said. "It would be better spent on those who might actually benefit, such as cancer sufferers. We have 5,800 people waiting to go into hospital in Swindon. A percentage of those will die as a result of waiting too long."

These words sent chills down my spine. I have heard them before. The euthanasia of severely disabled children at birth or soon afterward has been lurking for years. Lister's reasoning is the same as that of Hitler: severely disabled children are worthless.

While it's heartbreaking to hear this kind of talk today, the reality of the worthiness of a human life has been played out many times in the media and in private. Terri Schiavo's worthiness was front page news for weeks before and after she died.

Many parents are faced with the gut-wrenching decision of what to do when their child is born with severe disabilities that might never improve. Do they allow the child to die or fight for life? What will society say either way? How will they sleep at night regardless of their decision?

More importantly, who will support them in either decision? One side says life is precious and should be preserved at all costs. The other side begs for death, not wanting to live a life that is dependent on others - literally for every breath.

As a disabled person from birth, I cannot be so black and white about this issue. Soon I will be undergoing major surgery that may or may not improve my life. I'm struggling over whether to post a "Do Not Resuscitate" sign over my bed.

On one hand, to become more disabled than I am now appalls and frightens me. On the other, what if those life-saving procedures work and I go back to my regular life?

Whether the money comes from public funds or not, it's up to the person or the family to decide.

Either way, there will be suffering.

McKee, a wheelchair user, is an Albuquerque writer, poet and producer. You can e-mail Barbara at chairgrrl@chairgrrl.com. Her column runs on Tuesdays.

MORE MCKEE COLUMNS »

 
Search site for: Search help »